
Explanation of LGBTQ Terms
What does "LGBTQ" mean? An overview of microsite vocabulary.
One of the key challenges in understanding LGBTQ history is deciphering changes in word choice and language over time. Words that are common among community members and scholars today may have had vastly different meanings (or not existed at all) in the past.
We recognize that there are many different interpretations of, and a sensitivity to, various terms and how they are applied.聽We welcome your feedback聽as we expand on our work to promote and preserve LGBTQ historic places.
Though the terminology continues to evolve, we chose to use the acronym LGBTQ鈥擫esbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Questioning and/or Queer鈥攂ecause we feel that it most broadly incorporates members of non-heteronormative communities.
The 鈥淟GBTQ鈥 acronym is a relatively recent development in queer activism and scholarship.
Despite its limitations, our microsite uses this contemporary framework to discuss LGBTQ historic places, events, and people. This version of the LGBTQ+ acronym allows the microsite to change and evolve as the stories of lesser-known people and places come to light.
Though not used broadly here, the plus sign (+) acknowledges all non-heteronormative identities that are not specifically mentioned or that are yet to be articulated.
What is 鈥淗eteronormativity鈥?
The term 鈥渉eteronormativity鈥 (or heteronormative) originated among scholars of queer theory and is used to describe the commonly held perspective that heterosexuality is the normal, preferred, and default sexuality of individuals within a society.
Under this paradigm, social expectations around gender align (and often conflate) with Western ideals of the heterosexual male and female.
When this term is used on the microsite, it references the broad range of traditional sexual and gender identities and expressions within American society. 鈥淣on-heteronormative鈥 refers to individuals who do not adhere to these expectations.
鈥淨ueer鈥 as an Umbrella Term
By contrast, 鈥渜ueer鈥 is often used to describe all non-heteronormative individuals.
Before the 1990s, when 鈥渜ueer鈥 was reclaimed by LGBTQ activists and scholars as a term that was all-inclusive and empowering, it was a pejorative word used to insult and demean those who were non-heterosexual and non-gender conforming.
Among younger LGBTQ individuals, who commonly do not identify with a specific LGBT+ label, 鈥渜ueer鈥 is a popular term because it acknowledges the fluidity of gender and sexuality. Unlike the word 鈥渉omosexual,鈥 鈥渜ueer鈥 embraces a broad range of identities, including bisexual individuals.
Within the microsite, we use 鈥渜ueer鈥 as an adjective rather than a noun to describe communities of individuals who are non-heteronormative. When used as a noun, 鈥渜ueer鈥 continues to have a negative connotation.
鈥淗omosexuality鈥 in the Twentieth Century
鈥淗omosexual鈥 refers to an individual who engages in same-sex sexual behaviors. The term was widely used throughout the twentieth century yet used predominantly by heterosexuals in the second half of the century.
From the 1930s through the 1960s, LGBTQ individuals increasingly used the word 鈥済ay鈥 to describe all non-heteronormative individuals. This changed in the 1960s, when LGBTQ activists politicized the word 鈥済ay鈥 in an effort to obtain civil rights and access to social services.
It wasn鈥檛 until the 1970s that many queer women began to identify specifically as lesbians. The shift in language reflected the growing connection that lesbians felt to the experiences and struggles of heterosexual feminists, often outweighing their identification with gay men.
The word 鈥渉omosexual鈥 appears in this microsite within a historical context or when discussing significant LGBTQ locations that talk about the study of homosexuality within the medical field.
“Transsexual鈥 Versus “Transgender鈥
“Transsexual鈥 is a term that physicians employed in the early to mid-twentieth century to describe individuals who identified with and wanted to physically become members of the opposite sex.
鈥淭ransgender鈥 is a term coined by Virginia Prince (the publisher of聽Transvestia聽who identified as a transvestite) in 1970, and is used as an umbrella term to describe transexuals, transvestites, and other non-gender conforming identities.
The word 鈥渢ranssexual鈥 appears on this microsite within the context of the history of medicine, including the work of聽. Otherwise, 鈥渢ransgender鈥 is used.
“Latinx”鈥擨nclusion, not a Typo
If you’ve seen references to “Latinx” individuals or communities online, you may have initially thought the word contained a聽typo. This increasingly popular term, however, is a gender-netural alternative to Latina/o and Latin@, which many have used in the past to acknowledge the gendered (masculine/feminine) nature of the Spanish language.
The Conservancy now uses the terms “Latinx” and “Chicanx” in our work. Though we recognize that different people and communities self-identify in different ways, “Latinx” and “Chicanx” are gaining ground in our cultural discourse as a way of acknowledging and respecting people who are transgender, queer, or gender fluid or non-conforming.
These terms may not always be appropriate when describing people and events in the past (ex. Chicano Moratorium), but we are incorporating them into our vocabulary as part of our commitment to inclusion.聽